Will the EU agree to extend its favourable trade terms for Ukraine?

Pieter Cleppe | Issue 7 | Comment, Kyiv, Magazine

From the Archive

Ukrainian,President,Volodymyr,Zelenskiy,Is,Attending,A,Joint,Press,Conference

The EU must decide by 5 June whether to extend tariff-free trade with Ukraine. MEPs warn reintroducing duties could undermine support for Kyiv. Internal opposition, especially from farmers, complicates the issue. Brussels is also under fire for using trade policy to impose its regulations on global partners.

Will the EU agree to extend its favourable trade terms for Ukraine? By 5 June, the European Union must decide whether to extend the favourable trade access currently enjoyed by Ukraine. In a letter to the European Commission on the matter, several MEPs – including Bernd Lange, chair of the Parliament’s international trade committee, and Ukraine rapporteur Karin Karlsbro – warn that reintroducing customs duties on imports from that country “calls into question the EU’s solidarity” at a critical point in the war. They urge the Commission to seek at least “transitional measures” that pave the way for a fully liberalised trade agreement beneficial to both parties. The current EU–Ukraine trade arrangement, concluded in 2022 after the onset of Russian aggression, removed nearly all EU import tariffs and other trade barriers for Ukraine. A temporary emergency stop mechanism was later introduced for a limited number of agricultural products – including poultry, eggs, honey and sugar – which ac...

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.



Westminster booze-ups are tedious, but I miss them terribly

Marie Le Conte | October 6, 2020

Marie Le Conte

Why the Civil Service matters

Bernard Jenkin | October 6, 2020

By Bernard Jenkin

Never Let You Go: Clinging to our Leave/Remain Identities

James Tilley | October 6, 2020

James Tilley on why our Brexit identities still dominate four years on from the referendum.

Boris’s new Tudor court

Austen Sanders | October 6, 2020

Austen Saunders on why breaking with Europe, the SNP’s rising and Black Lives Matter is turning Britain into a divided, post-Brexit imperial Empire – And expect more waltzing

How the Momentum moment came and went

Emelia Hamilton | October 6, 2020

This Land: The Story of a Movement, by Owen Jones, reviewed by Emelia Wild

Soundbites and ‘Gotcha’ journalism have killed public discourse

Ferdie Rous | October 6, 2020

Why Can’t We All Just Get Along..., by Iain Dale, reviewed by Ferdie Rous

Iain Dale’s Top 100 in British Politics

Mace | October 5, 2020

The movers, shakers and rule-breakers making their mark in Westminster

The Jackdaw

Marie Le Conte | October 5, 2020

Parliament may be up and running but what’s the point of Westminster if all those endless drinks receptions are still forbidden? All work and no play is no

The Mace Questionnaire

Rosa Herxheimer | October 5, 2020

Ever wondered what MPs are really thinking? Here’s a preview of the Westminster Index, where we’ll be profiling everybody who’s anybody

Sharp Pencils, Sharper Wit

Adam Solomons | October 5, 2020

The ongoing cull of political cartoonists by national newspapers has triggered new conversations about the status of this idiosyncratic art form.