The EU Should Avoid Following the US Approach on Forced Labour

Marton Gyongyosi MEP | Issue 4 | Magazine, The Advocate
A protest against Uyghur forced labor by major fashion brands Nike, Uniqlo, Zara and Fila. 
In this image a group of “human mannequin” characters are posing at the entrance of New York Fashion Week event stating the abuse of these major clothing and fashion brands.

Forced labour and child labour not only is a moral outrage but also an illegitimate economic activity that undercuts products produced fairly in Europe.

The European Commission’s long-awaited proposal for banning the import of goods made with forced labour or child labour, has arrived. After being promised in not one but two State of the Union speeches, it is overdue. The content, though, is well-judged and it is refreshing to see the Commission restraining its desire for centralisation, and instead presenting a proposal that will invite cooperation with Member States, and with external trade partners. The Commission’s media operation, especially from DG Trade, has made no secret of the fact that China’s ongoing labour violations in the Xinjiang region are a significant motivator of this regulation. Good: for too long some EU governments (we all know who they are) have prioritised exports to China rather than facing down the reality of the oppression meted out by the Communist Party state. The recognition that China is a human rights abuser and products from that supply chain should be banned, is welcome. China is not the only transgre...

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.