The E.U. Should Follow the U.K.’s Model on Due Diligence

Michiel Hoogeveen | 10th November 2022 | Brussels, Comment, Uncategorised
brexit-flags

The U.K.’s current political and economic turmoil offers a model that no one on the continent would wish to follow right now – but its Due Diligence system, introduced in 2021, should be studied very closely

Earlier this year, the Commission published its Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence proposal, setting new rules for companies importing certain commodities, including palm oil, soy and coffee, into the EU. The objective is to tighten rules around commodities that are accused of links to deforestation.

The proposal will now be taken up by my colleagues in the European Parliament. As usual, hundreds of amendments will be tabled by dozens of MEPs – each with his or her own ideas about how best to make the Due Diligence system work.

There is a better way. A new Due Diligence system has been introduced just across the English Channel, and it shows a better way forward for the EU. The U.K.’s currently political and economic turmoil offers a model that no-one on the continent would wish to follow right now – but its Due Diligence system, introduced in 2021, should be studied very closely.

The primary benefit, when compared with the Commission proposal, is that the UK bases its system on a legality standard. In essence, this sets the objective of excluding all illegal deforestation from UK supply chains: a worthy goal that the EU also shares. The UK legislation, though, works in cooperation with partner countries by using local laws and regulations in exporting countries, as the basis for the legality standard. If it can be proven to be legally-produced locally, then the UK is …

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.



Protected: Hunt in Hampstead

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Eton Mess

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

David Cameron’s bio states that booking him offers an ‘unrivalled perspective on the future of the European Union’. This rings a little hollow when set against the referendum…

Happy Times

Mace | January 31, 2020

The strange hierarchy of the press gallery

The Seldon Slap

Mace | January 31, 2020

Sir Anthony Seldon's new book goes down well with Olly Robbins

Aggers for PM?

Mace | January 31, 2020

Jonathan Agnew – a politician?

They’ll do it Allison’s Way

Mace | January 31, 2020

Allison Pearson hosts a dinner for the bravest pro-Leave writers

A Bit of Sly and Laurie

Mace | January 31, 2020

Hugh Laurie on what Dickens would have made of Brexit

The Clown Prince Ascends to his Throne

Mace | January 29, 2020

There’s plenty of egg-on-face - or just embarrassed silence - for the many pundit hacks, often former Tory colleagues of Boris, who wrote him off as a priapic

Meet the Class of 2019

Mace | January 28, 2020

George Peel surveys the best of the new crop and finds much to celebrate in all the parties

The Lesson of Munich

Tim Congdon | January 28, 2020

The Establishment has been wrong before, notes Tim Congdon. Is it so crazy, he asks, to think that it might be wrong again?