The E.U. Should Follow the U.K.’s Model on Due Diligence

Michiel Hoogeveen | 10th November 2022 | Brussels, Comment, Uncategorised

The U.K.’s current political and economic turmoil offers a model that no one on the continent would wish to follow right now – but its Due Diligence system, introduced in 2021, should be studied very closely

Earlier this year, the Commission published its Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence proposal, setting new rules for companies importing certain commodities, including palm oil, soy and coffee, into the EU. The objective is to tighten rules around commodities that are accused of links to deforestation. The proposal will now be taken up by my colleagues in the European Parliament. As usual, hundreds of amendments will be tabled by dozens of MEPs – each with his or her own ideas about how best to make the Due Diligence system work. There is a better way. A new Due Diligence system has been introduced just across the English Channel, and it shows a better way forward for the EU. The U.K.’s currently political and economic turmoil offers a model that no-one on the continent would wish to follow right now – but its Due Diligence system, introduced in 2021, should be studied very closely. The primary benefit, when compared with the Commission proposal, is that the UK bases its system on a ...

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.