Foreign policy planning has never been the strong asset of the European Union
Russia’s recent military losses and withdrawals in Ukraine have prompted an intense discourse about the perspectives of a post-war, and perhaps, post-Putin Russia. Although an eventual change in the Kremlin could be expected, it is still hard to predict how it might look like. Even if the United States, the European Union and several European governments, including the British, French, German or Polish have voiced their support to Ukraine as long as it takes to defeat Russia, we have to remember that we are not in 1945 and Russia is not Hitler’s Germany. Ukrainian victory will certainly not mean that Western powers will have absolute control over what is going to happen to the country with the largest territory in the world. This fact gives some uncertainty to all projections. Any discussion about Russia’s future leadership may be premature, but it is high time we pinpointed the issues that can shape Europe’s policy towards Russia.
Foreign policy planning has never been a strong asset of the European Union
The difficulty of reaching a consensus among the different interests of its Member States and the complexity of the EU’s decision-making process often resulted in its failure to set the agenda in world politics. The ongoing war in Ukraine seems to affect this deficiency and the threat coming from Russia has contributed to the creation of a more uniform European foreign policy, marked by stricter sanctions, military aid and a single rhetoric in the relations towards Moscow. However, the ability to find a common voice in a defensive situation does not at all mean that this attitude can still prevail once the war is over and the European countries will have to switch to a more proactive role vis-à-vis Russia.
Certainly, the attempt to maintain a single European voice in foreign policy will be a serious test for the community. Different Member States’ approaches are not always easy to reconcile. Aspiring to a leading role in European foreign policy, France has always seen Russian relations as its opportunity to be a step ahead of the others in the community, while Germany was often criticised for its economy-based approach towards Russia, especially when it came to energy reliance. Despite the fact that now is a time for moderation, it is hard to believe that these reflexes, already deeply rooted in these two countries’ views on diplomacy, may soon disappear. At the same time, Poland and the Baltic states now feel more reassured than ever in their perception of Russia as a hostile nation. Although the political and economic weight of the two groups, the pragmatics and the idealistics, is hard to compare, such a difference of opinions can surely be enough to prevent the EU from finding a common position in a system that is based on consensual decision-making. However, the lack of consensus among Member States with contrasting views on Russian relations and the inability either to reconcile opinions or to enforce a single policy could lead the community back to its pre-war situation: an EU foreign policy with weak legitimacy and Member States that go on their own way. This would be a failure of the unity and a sign that the EU will not be able to stand up in world politics as a serious actor - enormous disappointment for the friends of a stronger EU.
Nevertheless, when it comes to France, Germany and other Member States unlikely to advocate for strict isolation of Russia on an emotional basis, there is still one question left. What can Russia offer to them? Whenever Russian economic relations are discussed, the first question that comes up is energy. Still far from the ultimate solution, the EU has nonetheless started to look for alternatives.
Europe is already importing energy from other sources. However, moving forward with renewable and green energy in the long run has already been a major objective of the community before the war and the current situation has justified it. In this case, ambitions to tackle climate change and increase Europe’s strategic autonomy coincide perfectly. It is clear that the longer it takes to end the war, the less demand Europe will have for Russian energy.
Even though EU countries might lose their interest in Russia as a source of energy, it will certainly not be the case with Russian markets. Abandoned by many European companies and seriously hit by the sanctions, Russia’s economy is not going through its best period. It has already slid in recession in the third quarter of 2022 as GDP dropped by 4 percent and projections show the decline will be permanent in the next years, contracting by 3,4 percent in 2022 and 2,3 percent in 2023 Currently, it is impossible to predict how long the sanctions will remain in force, but it is sure they will not be abandoned soon. At the same time, we can assume that once in the future the sanctions are lifted and there is a certain level of legal stability, Russia will be a promising market for European and western companies as it is a large e...
Subscribe to The Mace
Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of
what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs,
with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from
Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and
resource for the government affairs industry, offering required
reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.
To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes
having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing
professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by
government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy
and political decision-makers.
The Civil Service is ready to support Dame Antonia Romeo's flagship changes to government machinery - notably relating to AI and devolution - under new prime minister Andy
Andy Burnham is shaking up government with more changes than by any incoming prime minister in memory. But, asks Sir Bernard Jenkin MP, does he understand why the
UK aviation can decarbonise while meeting growth ambitions, but urgent government action is needed to prevent costs increasing for passengers and the sector losing its competitive edge.
The news that former Home Secretary Sir Grant Shapps has failed to make the new Tory candidate list has put fear into dozens of former Conservative MPs. Whether
Cameron Brown, a former special advisor to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, explains why Burnham's VAT cut on energy bills is a measure people will actually notice.
The strangely guilty way that the media, and some politicians have reacted to Widdecombe’s shocking death shows the double standards that can operate when a politician of the
James Purnell’s return to frontline politics is more than a nostalgic Blair-Brown era reunion. As Andy Burnham builds his Downing Street operation, public affairs professionals will need to