Erskine

Bernard Jenkin | Issue 5 | Magazine, Uncategorised

From the Archive

TheChamber

The Scottish draft Bill on gender recognition throws up uncertainties and would weaken women’s sex-based rights in the UK. Political dialogue is urgently needed

When the Labour government retained equal opportunities as a reserved power in the Scotland Act 1998, I was opposition constitutional affairs spokesman. I supported this on the grounds that the “imposition of draconian anti-discrimination laws has to be handled with great care, because it is all too easy to substitute one type of intolerance of minorities for another”. Holyrood, the Scottish parliament, now threatens to undermine this principle. The draft Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill would weaken women’s sex-based rights across the UK. 

Devolved powers are legislative powers that the UK Parliament controlled in the past, but are now devolved to the legislatures in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. These include matters such as education and health. Reserved powers, as specified in the Scotland Act, for example, remain exclusively with the UK Parliament in Westminster.  

Human rights are a devolved competence. The powers to pass a gender recognition act are therefore notionally devolved, but apply only if such an act does not impact on the reserved powers. UK citizens currently have their legal sex status recorded on their birth certificate. The only way to change their recorded sex is to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). The sex recorded on the GRC, with a few exceptions,
is a person’s sex for ‘all purposes under the law’. Eligibility to apply for …

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.



Fags, Booze and Sass – why we need Princess Margaret

Olenka Hamilton | February 2, 2020

Now the Sussexes are stepping away from official duties, we need the sass of Princess Margaret like never before

Protected: Hunt in Hampstead

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Eton Mess

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

David Cameron’s bio states that booking him offers an ‘unrivalled perspective on the future of the European Union’. This rings a little hollow when set against the referendum…

Happy Times

Mace | January 31, 2020

The strange hierarchy of the press gallery

The Seldon Slap

Mace | January 31, 2020

Sir Anthony Seldon's new book goes down well with Olly Robbins

Aggers for PM?

Mace | January 31, 2020

Jonathan Agnew – a politician?

They’ll do it Allison’s Way

Mace | January 31, 2020

Allison Pearson hosts a dinner for the bravest pro-Leave writers

A Bit of Sly and Laurie

Mace | January 31, 2020

Hugh Laurie on what Dickens would have made of Brexit

The Clown Prince Ascends to his Throne

Mace | January 29, 2020

There’s plenty of egg-on-face - or just embarrassed silence - for the many pundit hacks, often former Tory colleagues of Boris, who wrote him off as a priapic

Meet the Class of 2019

Mace | January 28, 2020

George Peel surveys the best of the new crop and finds much to celebrate in all the parties