‘Drill, baby, drill’ is not a long-term strategy, bodies warn.

Pablo John | 19th March 2026 | Comment, Trade Associations
The debate around energy and energy security has grown in significance since war in Iran broke out (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
The debate around energy and energy security has grown in significance since war in Iran broke out (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

Whilst oil and gas may seem like seductive choices, the government must look beyond the soundbites, warns Pablo John.

Pablo John is Head of External Affairs at ADE Walk down around any small town and you'll pass them. The food processing plant on the edge of town or the family manufacturer that's been there for three generations. These businesses don't make headlines, but they employ your neighbours and they pay taxes. But they are being left for dead. Last week, Richard Tice stood in a Dudley steel factory and offered these towns a deal. Drill for more oil and gas, frack the lot, bring back the fossil fuel good old days. It was the same pitch Donald Trump is making to Detroit; there is no future, so dig up the past. Tice is right about the problem, these towns are hurting. Energy bills are crushing them and good jobs are disappearing. When they look to Westminster for help, they see a government obsessed with a handful of giant industrial clusters, while everyone else gets nothing. But “drill, baby drill" won't save a food factory in the Lincolnshire or a distillery in South Yorkshire. It just chains them to the same volatile global gas prices that are killing them now.  Westminster has already picked its favourites. The government's energy strategy revolves around six big industrial clusters - places like Teesside, Humber, Grangemouth and South Wales - where heavy industry is huddled together to shelter from the (metaphorical) cold. Billions are being poured into carbon capture pipes and hydrogen plans for these sites, there are glossy brochures, ministerial visits and big promises. Yet, everyone else is left behind. Successive governments have failed to understand the fact that British industry is not just six big clusters on the map. Half of all industrial emissions in this country come from sites that aren't in their designated industrial clusters. The food factories, the distilleries, the precision engineers, the family manufacturers, they employ 770,000 people directly – support 3.6 million indirect jobs - and they have no support whatsoever. That's enough people to staff the Scottish health service four times over, that’s more than double the working-age population of Manchester. Fathers in Mansfield, young apprentices in Ayr, skilled engineers in Stoke who learned their trade from parents who did the same job before them. When one of those factories closes, it tears a hole in the fabric of a town, a whole community starts to unravel. Imagine running a business in rural Britain. You want to cut costs, go green, secure your future and so you look at electrifying your processes. This is a great idea, until you ask for a grid connection. The queue stretches to up to 10 years the quote for upgrading the local network can be over £10 million before you've bought a single bit of kit. One distillery we spoke to got exactly that quote and walked away. Or you look at the running costs, where we have built all these wonderful wind farms, but we have loaded green levies onto electricity bills. We are literally taxing the energy we want businesses to use and subsidising the fuel we want them to ditch.  The big solutions the government loves - hydrogen pipelines, carbon capture networks - will never reach these places. You are not piping hydrogen to an industrial estate in rural Norfolk; they're on their own. We know that this can work. Just look at British Sugar's factory in Wissington, Norfolk. Wissington has undergone the biggest decarbonisation project in the company's history. £43 million invested in new steam dryers, with a £7.5 million grant from the government's Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (IETF), resulting in thousands of tonnes of carbon removed from the site's footprint every single year. This project would not be possible without significant investment from the Government. Government money, targeted at a rural factory in Norfolk, delivering real cuts to emissions and real savings on energy bills. It proves that when the government shows up, rural industry can thrive. But the IETF fund that supported the project is now closed, no replacement has been announced. So, nothing happens. Rural industry doesn’t invest, they can't compete with European rivals paying half their energy costs, eventually, they shut in a display of slow-motion de-industrialisation. This is the gap which the populists are filling. The fossil fuel industry walks through an empty factory and says, "The system failed you. Let's just turn the gas back on." It's a simple, albeit seductive, dead end. But there is another way, it requires the government to see the 770,000 workers it's ignoring. But picture this instead; a Dumfries industrial estate where a dozen small engineering firms share one large solar array and a communal battery. They generate power together, store it together and use it together. Their energy bills drop, they’re not at the mercy of global gas markets, they're in control. When the grid is under pressure, they can even sell power back and get paid for it. The technology exists, the only thing missing is a government wil...

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.

In the Shadows: How Campaigners Shift the Debate

Damian Collins MP | October 14, 2020

Damian Collins MP explains how digital campaigns alter our perceptions of the news

Steve Bannon Campaign Hashtag Digital

Brighton Revisited: A Lesson for the PM?

William Cash | October 12, 2020

William Cash asks whether the PM can learn from how Thatcher handled the IRA bombing of exactly 36 years ago

Grand Hotel Brighton 1984 Bombing

The Jackdaw

Marie Le Conte | October 5, 2020

Parliament may be up and running but what’s the point of Westminster if all those endless drinks receptions are still forbidden? All work and no play is no

Diary: The Hack is Back

Peter Cardwell | October 3, 2020

Peter Cardwell is enjoying his retirement from SpAd life

Erskine: Bernard Jenkin MP

Mace | October 1, 2020

Attempts to modernise the civil service, one of the great institutions of state, will put unnecessary strain on the UK constitution

The Diary of a Data Miner

Adam Solomons | March 8, 2020

Mindfuck, by Christopher Wylie, reviewed by Adam Solomons

Thirty Women: Thirty Powerful Voices

Benjamin Goodwin | March 8, 2020

She Speaks: The Power of Women's Voices, by Yvette Cooper, reviewed by Benjamin Goodwin

Constituency vitae: David Lammy on Tottenham

David Lammy | February 3, 2020

The north London constituency is not without its problems, admits David Lammy, but it remains a destination second to none…

Protected: Hunt in Hampstead

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

The Lesson of Munich

Tim Congdon | January 28, 2020

The Establishment has been wrong before, notes Tim Congdon. Is it so crazy, he asks, to think that it might be wrong again?