Peer’s Nuclear Energy Advocacy Sparks Debate

Mace | 9th April 2025 | Uncategorised

Conservative peer Olivia Bloomfield faces scrutiny over her ties to Terrestrial Energy, raising questions about lobbying, conflicts of interest, and the revolving door between politics and industry. Her case highlights broader concerns about transparency in the UK's nuclear energy strategy.

Conservative peer Olivia Bloomfield finds herself at the epicentre of criticism as questions mount over her ties to Canadian firm Terrestrial Energy. Since her affiliation with the company began in 2018, Bloomfield has advocated for its interests both inside and outside of government. These connections, coupled with financial benefits accrued from advisory positions, have ignited a debate about the intersection of politics and industry influence. Despite Bloomfield asserting that she has complied with all regulations, her actions are being closely scrutinised. Documents disclosed under freedom of information laws reveal that Bloomfield facilitated key meetings between Terrestrial Energy executives and government ministers during her tenure in the House of Lords. The Guardian has highlighted the notable example of a meeting in April 2018 with then-Junior Business Minister Richard Harrington, which Whitehall officials described as an “ambush.” Concerns were raised internally that Bloomf...

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.