The Cummings Revolution – help or hindrance?

Ed Amory | Issue 2 | Magazine, Politics

From the Archive

Ed Amory

I’ve experienced the world of government communications from multiple different angles over my career. As a staffer in Conservative Central Office, I worked alongside department comms teams. As a journalist on the Mail for 12 years, I spent hours trying to extract information from unenthusiastic press officers. Then over the last eight years as a communications consultant, I had central government departments as clients.

So I was fascinated to read about Dominic Cummings’ reported plan to streamline government communications teams, with the apparent intention of cutting the numbers in any one department to an average of 30. Given that some currently have around 300 people working in marketing and communications, this would be a significant contraction as well as a further shift of power towards the centre, mirroring the process that has already taken place with special advisers.

With some of my former hats on, I have sympathy with those who want reform. When I was a journalist, many of my interactions with departmental press offices involved their determination not to answer my questions. It seemed hard to imagine that 300 people might be needed to achieve this. Then when I was a professional political communicator, I was often exasperated by the refusal of departmental press offices to join us in the trenches. More recently, as a consultant, it was noticeable that …

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.



Last Orders: Sir Anthony Seldon

Mace | February 2, 2020

Fresh from writing an account of Theresa May’s time in Downing Street, the historian finds time to talk about the state of the nation – and other matters.

Fags, Booze and Sass – why we need Princess Margaret

Olenka Hamilton | February 2, 2020

Now the Sussexes are stepping away from official duties, we need the sass of Princess Margaret like never before

Protected: Hunt in Hampstead

Ferdie Rous | January 31, 2020

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

The Lesson of Munich

Tim Congdon | January 28, 2020

The Establishment has been wrong before, notes Tim Congdon. Is it so crazy, he asks, to think that it might be wrong again?

Heads of State

Christopher Jackson | January 28, 2020

Christopher Jackson meets the Harley Street surgeon whose busts of world leaders are winning him friends in high places.

Pepys: The Rotten Racket of Party Selection

Pepys | January 28, 2020

How much longer can CCHQ’s hypocritical attitude towards public schools last?

Long Table: Lord Butler on the Ship of State

Lord Robin Butler | January 28, 2020

The former cabinet secretary, now a Lords crossbencher, describes his life as a peer and the differing demands of serving under five prime ministers.

The Spike: Henry Deedes’s Waspish Wit

Benjamin Goodwin | January 26, 2020

In our series on lobby journalists, Benjamin Goodwin meets the Daily Mail’s latest Boz .

Stranger’s: Parliamentary Assistant

Sophie Stowers | January 26, 2020

Life as an MP's aide is a dream job - but not when it means dealing with everyday sexism. Parliament's workplace culture needs to change, says Sophie Stowers

The Dark Art of Lobbying

Adam Solomons | January 24, 2020

We lift the lid on the industry cloaked in mystery.