Norway Backtracks on Climate Commitments

Pierre Bois d’Enghien | 15th October 2021 | Uncategorised
michael-fousert-lE5-z4nTCTQ-unsplash

Norway’s stonewalling on deforestation incentive payments to Indonesia undermines future rich-poor cooperation on climate change

The likelihood of Boris Johnson being able to strike a far-reaching new global climate deal at the Cop26 meeting in Glasgow has been dealt a fresh blow by the collapse of a little-known climate finance agreement. 

Just recently, Indonesia’s Foreign Ministry announced that it was cancelling a decade-long agreement with Norway known as REDD, under which Indonesia would receive payments for reducing deforestation rates. 

According to Jakarta, Norway was delaying payments that were agreed by both parties after Indonesia posted its lowest deforestation rates on record. 

Norway’s obstinance – and Indonesia’s response – have profound implications for climate diplomacy and for the conference in Glasgow. Success depends on rich, Western countries (such as Norway) and poorer developing countries (such as Indonesia) finding common cause and striking a common deal together. That Norway now stands accused of breaking its climate promises will deepen suspicion amongst countries in the Global South that the West is big on climate talk, but not so big when action – or hard cash – is required.

When Indonesia and Norway signed their agreement in 2010, reducing emissions was a higher priority for wealthy countries; poor countries were simply more concerned with alleviating poverty and raising living standards. 

It was well understood that a ‘low carbon transition’ for poor and even middle income …

Subscribe to The Mace

Join the member community shaping British politics and stay ahead of what's really happening in the world of politics and public affairs, with expert analysis, breaking news, and insider insights from Westminster and Brussels. The Mace is the leading news source and resource for the government affairs industry, offering required reading and lobby intelligence for professionals.

To see what you are missing out on by not subscribing to The Mace, click here to download our full membership info-pack. This includes having no paywall on op-ed content or profiles/interviews, allowing professional profiles to be read with maximum impact and visibility by government, special advisers, MPs, peers, civil servants, and policy and political decision-makers.



A Bit of Sly and Laurie

Mace | January 31, 2020

Hugh Laurie on what Dickens would have made of Brexit

The Clown Prince Ascends to his Throne

Mace | January 29, 2020

There’s plenty of egg-on-face - or just embarrassed silence - for the many pundit hacks, often former Tory colleagues of Boris, who wrote him off as a priapic

Meet the Class of 2019

Mace | January 28, 2020

George Peel surveys the best of the new crop and finds much to celebrate in all the parties

Who are the key players in justice today?

Christopher Jackson | January 21, 2020

Christopher Jackson provides an update of a department about to enter a period of considerable flux.

A New Magazine for a New Parliament

Mace | January 16, 2020

When the clocks struck 11pm on 31 January, it was the end of our 45-year relationship with the EU.